assessing the impacts of climate-related and environmental physical and transition risks on all asset classes of the balance sheet; guiding you in the materiality assessment methodology for non-financial reporting purposes (e.g. CSRD)
Transition towards a more sustainable economy is essential, to comply with regulations, meet demand, and mitigate financial and non-financial risks. This transition will have substantial material impact on financial institutions and it’s essential to prepare as early as possible.
Sustainable finance is the mobilisation of finance to integrate environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria into business or investment decisions, leading to sustainable activities and growth, and the transition to a climate-neutral economy.
For financial institutions, the need to address sustainable finance is driven by increased regulation, market demand and various risks.
Regulators and supervisory authorities have been establishing sustainability/ESG requirements and standards that financial institutions and functions have to comply with, culminating notably in the 2018 EU Action Plan.
Meanwhile, the market demand for sustainable financial products and services is increasing significantly, especially in private banking and asset and wealth management (AWM). Accordingly, more solutions with an ESG focus are being offered to private and institutional investors.
Customers are increasingly willing to pay more for sustainable solutions. If several competitors offer similar conditions, customers can be expected – for ethical reasons – to base their decisions on sustainability considerations.
As ESG investing continues to take hold, there are risks of greenwashing: the combination of growing investor demand with a fast-evolving market and increasing regulation can give rise to [intentional or unintentional] greenwashing, in the form of misrepresentation, mis-labelling or mis-selling.
The financial (socio-economic) impact of a changing climate, including more frequent extreme weather events and gradual changes in climate, as well as of environmental degradation
An institution’s financial loss that can result, directly or indirectly, from the process of adjustment towards a lower-carbon and more environmentally sustainable economy.
Today, fulfilling ESG-related regulatory requirements, offering sustainable products and promoting ESG as an investment theme is a baseline for all financial services. But more is needed.
The increasing demand for sustainability in financial services makes it imperative to fully integrate sustainability and ESG into your mid- and long-term strategic ambitions.
Where you are on the ‘sustainability scale’ is fast becoming a key success factor. Not only as a response to market and investor demand and a creator of competitive advantage, but as an opportunity to generate new revenue sources.
New products and services: in response to market demand or to create new demand.
New client segments and target markets: either existing but not previously targeted, or for new products and services.
New business models: potential for innovation, e.g. new partnerships or distributions channels.
In line with market and supervisory expectations, financial institutions will have to integrate ESG risks with their overall business model and strategy. This implies re-assessing your entire operating model.
Financial institutions will have to identify, document, and determine the effects (from short to long term) of ESG risks by developing a set of new KPIs. These new risks can have a three-fold impact on the business environment in which you operate, namely through macroeconomic shocks, the competitive landscape, and market sentiment.
Economic growth, unemployment rates, real estate prices at national, regional, or local level might experience a shock due to physical events (e.g. massive floods) and transition events (e.g. government implements policy that makes a certain area less attractive driving prices down or vice versa).
With increasing regulation and technological advancement, banks that are highly exposed to energy-intensive industries (e.g. oil sector) will probably see their clients needing significant capital expenditures to pursue decarbonization.
Consumers might prefer greener banks and products to a cheaper non energy efficient financial institution.
Particularly, reputation considerations linked to sustainability is becoming more and more important to clients.
The extent to which these factors will impact your strategy and business model will be clarified through a scenario analysis and stress testing exercise, which will also help define new KPIs and KRIs and highlight the limitations, vulnerabilities, and shortcomings of current available data.
The management body is expected to specifically address ESG risks when developing the strategy, objectives, and risk appetite framework. This implies that your whole organisational structure and reporting framework has to be revised on the basis of these new risks.
Financial institutions will have to fully integrate climate-related and environmental risks with their risk management framework. From credit to operational risk, a newly integrated framework will be shaped by capital considerations and will in turn affect those requirements.
Conducting climate risk materiality assessment enables you to identify the main exposures each portfolio is exposed to, considering geographies, sectors and related transmission channels
Not only are climate scenario analyses and stress testing the next logical steps, but they are required under ECB expectations. In the supervisory stress test, scenarios are modelled based on the timelines and depth of policy action. Climate change evolves differently under each scenario, so companies are affected differently. From challenges such as lack of data to scenario modelling, we can support you throughout the entire process.
Financial institutions will have to disclose information about their consideration of, and approach to, ESG risks, including the materiality level of each of the identified risks, underlying methodologies, KPIs and KRIs.
In addition, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is driving a significant number of efforts to collect and assess data that are relevant and material to report, based on the applicable EU sustainability reporting standards (ESRS).
Under SFDR, financial institutions will also have to comply with multiple other disclosure obligations (e.g. principal adverse impacts on sustainability factors, pre-contractual information for products promoting environmental or social characteristics or having a sustainable investment as objective etc.).
We take a holistic approach to ESG financial services, from impact assessment and analysis, to reporting, to ongoing monitoring. Our core services are:
We also offer a number of tools and methodologies, including the PwC Climate Excellence Tool, a software to make climate-related financial impacts visible.