Latest update: 31 July 2018
On 24 July 2018 the federal government reached a social and labor “summer agreement” (so-called jobsdeal) containing some tax measures, such as changes to employer’s tax reporting obligations of some equity incentives and the acceleration of the entry into force of the 30% EBITDA rule from 2020 to 2019.
At the end of 2017, the Corporate Income Tax Reform Act and the Program Act have introduced an important tax reform package. As key components of this package, the corporate income tax rate is being gradually reduced to 25% in 2020, and fiscal consolidation will be introduced. The reform takes effect over a three-year period (2018, 2019 and 2020).
On 1 March 2018, the Constitutional Court annulled the fairness tax going forward, specifically stating that the tax would be maintained for assessment years 2014 up to and including 2018. The Court ruled that, for instance, where dividends were redistributed in a manner falling within the scope of the Parent Subsidiary Directive, the fairness tax would be annulled retroactively.
Subsequently, on 19 July 2018 the Chamber passed a draft law amending and supplementing the Corporate Income Tax Reform Act and the Program Act (“Act on Various Income Tax Provisions”, hereinafter referred to as “the amending law”). The most important changes and technical improvements introduced by the amending law are included in the text below.
The standard corporate income tax rate of 33% is lowered to 29% in 2018 and to 25% as from 2020. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) will see a decrease in the rate to 20% as from 2018 for the first bracket of EUR 100,000 in profit. These rates are to be increased with the crisis tax, which is also lowered for 2018 and will be abolished in 2020.
2018 |
2020 |
|
Old corporate income tax rate |
33% |
33% |
New corporate income tax rate |
29% |
25% |
SMEs (first bracket of EUR 100.000) |
20% |
20% |
Former crisis tax |
3% |
3% |
New crisis tax |
2% |
0% |
The new rules do not apply to losses incurred by SMEs starters.
The group contribution is deductible from the taxpayer’s profits of the assessment year provided that the profit is effectively included in the tax return of the receiving company and provided that the compensation has actually been paid (proof should be provided if requested).
Under similar conditions it will in practice also be possible to deduct final losses of a foreign subsidiary under the consolidation regime. However, a recapture rule of the final losses is introduced when the activities are restarted within the period of three years in the foreign country.
The amending law provides for an anti-abuse measure in the case of reorganisation. According to this provision, a merged company can only qualify for the consolidation if all individual companies were qualifying companies before the merger.
Although this measure would only enter into force as from 2020, the Belgian government decided in July 2018 that it would advance the entry into force to 2019 (assessment year 2020 that is linked to a taxable period that starts, at the earliest, on 1 January 2019).
Holders of one or more securities accounts in Belgium or abroad with total assets equal to or exceeding EUR 500,000 are subject to tax at a rate of 0.15% of the average value of the total amount of taxable assets. The taxable assets are the following: funds, quoted or unquoted bonds, “kasbons”/“bons de caisse”, warrants, share and bond certificates, quoted shares and unquoted shares registered in securities accounts. Registered shares registered in the share register, pension savings accounts and life insurance are excluded. However, an anti-abuse rule has been introduced to include in the scope of the tax taxable assets that were converted into non-taxable assets on or after 9 December 2017. Another specific anti-abuse measure is introduced to tackle the contribution of securities accounts to legal entities. The average value will be calculated on the basis of a reference period (1 October to 30 September). In the case of joint ownership, the securities account is deemed to be held by the holders for equal parts. Corrections can be made on the basis of supporting documents. In principle, the tax will be collected by the financial institution that will also determine the value of the accounts concerned. The withholding is automatic when the holder has a securities account equal to or exceeding EUR 500,000 with a financial institution and when the holder who has securities accounts with several financial institutions has opted for the tax withholding to be operated by the institution because he may reach the taxable threshold. In other cases, it is for the holder to file the tax return, determine the tax amount and make the payment. The securities accounts will also have to be reported in the personal income tax return. Penalties will be applicable if the compliance obligations regarding the tax return are not met, in the case of late payment of the tax or if the holder does not provide the information requested by the tax authorities. This tax entered into force on 10 march 2018.
As from now, qualifying intellectual property (IP) income is called ‘innovation income’, which reflects the broader scope of the qualifying income. The Innovation Income Deduction (IID) can apply to income derived from the following intellectual property (IP) of which the company or branch has the full ownership, co-ownership, usufruct or license or rights to use on:
IP of copyrighted software resulting from a research or development project as defined for the purposes of the partial exemption of wage withholding tax for research and development and which has not yet generated income before 1 July 2016.
Under the PID system, the benefit was only available as from the year the patent was actually granted.
The benefit under the IID will also be available by way of a temporary exemption (which will lead to a permanent exemption once the qualifying IP right has been granted) as from the date the qualifying IP right has been applied for. As the copyright of software automatically exists without request (provided conditions are met), there is no temporary exemption in this respect.
All marketing related intangibles such as trademarks will not qualify for tax benefits under the IID system.
Without making any restrictions to SMEs, the following income will be considered as derived from the above qualifying IP in so far as the remuneration is included in the Belgian taxable result of the Belgian company or branch concerned:
Furthermore, also the proceeds from a transfer of qualifying IP are in the scope of the deduction, subject to a reinvestment condition to be met within 5 years.
For the first taxable period during which the IID will be applied, the (net) innovation income should be decreased with the overall expenditure incurred during (preceding) taxable periods ending after 30 June 2016. Alternatively, one can opt to spread this recapture on a straight line basis during a period of maximum 7 years. In the case that the qualifying IP right terminates or is alienated before the end of this 7-year period, a correction will apply in order to limit the IID actually applied to the amount that would have been applied if no spread recapture had been opted for.
In consideration of avoiding that the Belgian IID regime would appear to constitute a harmful tax practice, the modified nexus approach has to be taken into account. The nexus approach intends to ensure that, in order for a significant proportion of innovation income to qualify for benefits, a significant proportion of the actual research and development (R&D) activities must have been undertaken by the taxpayer itself.
As a matter of business practice, unlimited outsourcing to related parties or acquisition of IP from related parties should not provide many opportunities for taxpayers to receive benefits without themselves engaging in substantial activities.
Given the above, the IID will be determined by multiplying the innovation income with the below ratio. The fraction represents the ratio between the own R&D activities and the outsourced R&D activities/acquired IP (towards/from related parties). As such, the taxable result of a Belgian company or branch will be reduced by 85% of the total net innovation income after this fraction has been applied.
Important to note is that the ratio will be calculated on a net basis implying that (contrary to the PID regime) current-year deducted overall expenditure should be deducted from the current-year qualifying innovation income.
It is thereby also provided that any excess deduction that cannot be used due to insufficient taxable basis can be carried forward (without any limitation in amount or time) to be compensated with future taxable profits (contrary to the PID system).
Furthermore, the law provides for continuity of the IID in the case of tax neutral reorganisations (e.g. contribution, merger or (partial) demerger). This continuity is also foreseen now for the PID.
Qualifying expenditure
The qualifying expenditure is the expenditure incurred by the company itself or the compensation for expenses of non-related companies in relation to outsourced R&D activities.
Qualifying expenditure must be directly connected with the qualifying IP. The expenditure does not include interest payments, costs related to immovable assets or any costs that could not be directly linked to a specific intangible. If R&D activities are outsourced to a non-related company via a related company, the related costs will qualify as qualifying expenditure on the condition that the compensation is charged without mark-up (i.e. as a disbursement). Based on the OECD Report on Action Point 5, the total acquisition cost related to qualifying intangible property should not be taken into account as qualifying expenditure but should be included in the overall expenditure.
Uplift of the qualifying expenditure
The qualifying expenditure may be uplifted by 30%, with a maximum of the overall expenditure. This means that the uplift may increase the qualifying expenditure but only to the extent that the taxpayer has non-qualifying expenditure. The purpose of this uplift is to ensure that the nexus approach does not penalise taxpayers excessively for acquiring IP or outsourcing R&D activities to related parties.
In exceptional circumstances, it can occur that although an uplift of 30% is added, the nexus ratio does not represent reality. As such, the modified nexus ratio can be rebutted by the taxpayer if the ratio as set out above (excluding the uplift) equals or exceeds 25%. A higher ratio may be applied in case the taxpayer proves that the outcome of the ratio between self-performed activities for R&D and the total R&D activities does not reflect reality. A ruling should be obtained in this respect.
Overall expenditure
The overall expenditure in the denominator of the ratio includes the qualifying expenditure increased with the acquisition costs related to qualifying intangible property and the expenditure for related-party outsourcing.
Since the nexus approach depends on there being a nexus between expenditure and income, taxpayers will have to carefully track and trace the expenditure, qualifying IP and income. In this respect it is provided that supporting documentation will have to be kept available for the tax authorities (such as the gross amount of the income, the actual value of IP acquired from a related company, the overall expenditure of the current year and the qualifying and overall expenditures over the life time of the IP).
In practice, it can be predicted that this will not be that easy to manage and may imply a cumbersome administrative burden for Belgian taxpayers. A transitional period is provided up to and including tax year 2019 (financials years ending as of 31 December 2018 until 30 December 2019, both dates inclusive). More detailed information with respect to this tracking and tracing and the timing thereof will be further determined by Royal Decree.
The new system enters into force as of 1 July 2016, so a taxpayer may apply the PID in the first 6 months of 2016 and the IID in the last 6 months. Taxpayers benefitting from the PID regime or taxpayers that requested or acquired a patent prior to 1 July 2016, will be able to choose for the PID or the IID regime and will be able to receive the benefits under the PID for another five years (grandfathering until 30 June 2021).
The choice for the PID is irrevocable and must (in principle) be made per IP right.
Latest update: 31 July 2018
On 24 July 2018 the federal government reached a social and labor “summer agreement” (so-called jobsdeal) containing some tax measures, such as changes to employer’s tax reporting obligations of some equity incentives.
At the end of 2017, the Corporate Income Tax Reform Act and the Program Act have introduced an important tax reform package, which takes effect over a three-year period (2018, 2019 and 2020). As key component of this package, the corporate income tax rate is being gradually reduced to 25% in 2020. On 19 July 2018, the Chamber passed a draft law amending and supplementing the Corporate Income Tax Reform Act and the Program Act (“Act on Various Income Tax Provisions”, hereinafter referred to as “the amending law”).
From a personal tax point of view, the following measures are or would be introduced.
Following the introduction of the mobility allowance (“cash for car”), the government also started working on a mobility budget, which is actually the next step in the effort of reducing the number of cars on the Belgian roads. At this point in time no texts are available and only a communication of the Minister of Finance is available.
It is anticipated that the mobility budget – if adopted by the parliament – will co-exist with the recently introduced mobility allowance. Where the mobility allowance can only be granted under the beneficial tax and social security treatment if an employee hands in his/her company car, the announced mobility budget allows the employer to provide a company car and other ways of transportation for commuting simultaneously.
The amount of the mobility budget will be based on the “total cost of ownership” (TCO) of the company car for the employer. This is the total cost, on a yearly basis, which the employer bears for providing a company car to the employee, including the cost for fuel, insurances, taxes, maintenance, … .
The main conditions for implementing the mobility budget are foreseen to be the same as for the mobility allowance. It is anticipated that similar anti-abuse legislation will be included as well.
When an employer chooses implements a mobility budget, the employee will have the possibility to opt for a smaller, more eco-friendly and potentially cheaper model (under the existing car policy of the employer). The new, more eco-friendly car will be treated in the same way as any other company car, meaning that there is a taxable benefit in kind in the hands of the employee, a limitation of the corporate cost deductibility for the employer based on the CO2 emission of the car and a CO2 contribution due.
For the remaining part of the mobility budget to which the employee is entitled, he/she can choose for alternative (and more sustainable) means of commuting, such as a subscription for using public transportation, for a system of car sharing, … or even for receiving a biking allowance and use a bike for (a part of) his commute. It is foreseen that this part of the budget can be provided tax free and would be fully deductible for the employers.
In case there is still budget available (after switching the current company car for a smaller model and/or making use of alternative means of transportation) the employee can have this remaining part paid out in cash. It is anticipated that this payment will only be subject to Belgian social security contributions, 25% for the employer and 13,07% for the employee.
The Act introducing the Mobility Allowance (“Cash for car”) offering the employees a cash alternative for their company car has been published in the Official Gazette. As of 1 January 2018, employees (who already use a company car) can be given the choice to exchange their current company car for a cash compensation, provided that both parties (employer and employee) agree to do so. As it is a voluntary scheme, the employer needs to decide to offer this possibility (and determine the conditions within the provisions of the law) and the employee can opt (voluntarily) to apply for this scheme.
Employers who are interested in offering this choice to their employees will be bound by some restrictions foreseen in the law. The introduction of this scheme is only possible for instance if the employer has been providing company cars to its employees for a minimum period of 3 years (36 months). There is an exception for starting companies. Furthermore, it is required that the employees (who request to switch from a company car to a mobility budget) have been provided with a company car for a period of at least 12 months in the past 36 months, of which 3 consecutive months prior to requesting a mobility budget.
The corresponding cash amount (that employees will receive for no longer having the private use of a company car) is set at 20% of 6/7 of the catalogue value of the car handed in. This amount will be subject to indexation. If the employee also had a fuel card at his/her disposal, the mobility allowance is increased by 20% (24% of 6/7 of the catalogue value of the handed in).
As it is currently the case for the benefit in kind of a company car, no employee’s social security contributions is due in the hands of employees who receive a mobility allowance. Furthermore, in most cases employees with a mobility allowance will face a lower tax burden as they will become taxable on an amount which is determined by taking into account 4% of 6/7 of the catalogue value of the car handed in (which will is likely to be lower than the taxable amount of the benefit in kind of the company car). The taxable amount is also subject to indexation. The cash amount of the mobility allowance exceeding this amount is exempt from social security contributions and taxes for the employees. The amount paid by the employer is subject to the same CO2 contribution as the car handed in and will be tax deductible for the employer for 75% up to 90%.
Because the mobility allowance may not be used to replace ‘ordinary salary’ or ‘other benefits’, several anti-abuse measures are implemented.
The mobility allowance is introduced as of 1 January 2018 and will be subject to evaluation after one year.
Participation in the company’s profits: This measure consists in allowing the employees (not applicable to self-employed company directors) to participate in the company profit, without having to hold a share in the company’s capital. This measure is optional and not mandatory for the companies.
The maximum amount of the profit participation is limited to 30% of the total wage bill (‘masse salariale’/’loonmassa’) and consists in a fixed amount or fixed percentage of the employee’s salary (‘general’ profit participation premium). It is not allowed to use the profit participation as a replacement for salary. Finally, the profit participation bonus is not taken into account for calculating the payroll standard (which determines the maximum margin of increase in wage costs in the private sector and in certain State-owned enterprises).
The employee is liable to pay a special social security contribution of 13.07% on the one hand and a profit premium tax of 7% on the other hand.
The employer has not to pay special employer’s social security contributions. However, the profit participation premium will be treated as a disallowed expenses for corporate tax since this premium is not considered to be salary and is therefore not deductible.
Comparing the profit participation to the CAO90 bonus, some differences need to be taken into account. The CAO90 bonus is subjected to a special solidarity contribution of 13.07% by the employee (cfr. profit participation premium) but is tax exempted up to a certain level resulting in a higher net amount for the employee.
However, the profit participation premium is intended to be less complex to implement. For example, no agreement of the labour unions is in principle needed when a ‘general’ profit participation premium is granted (if the same amount for each employee is used).
Also, the maximum amount of the profit participation premium that can be granted to an employee is much higher than the CAO bonus (30% of the total salary mass instead of an absolute maximum of 3.255 before deduction of solidarity contribution).
Belgian tax on savings income (art. 19bis ITC): currently, capital gains realized on shares or units of capitalizing collective investment funds investing more than 25% of their assets in debt claims are subject to a withholding tax of 30%. Under the proposed rules, the 25% threshold is reduced to 10% while the investment funds in scope are extended to alternative funds not only investing in securities. These changes are applicable to income paid in relation to fund shares/units acquired as from 1 January 2018.
Contractual investment funds (FCP/GBF): the application of the Belgian tax on savings income (art. 19bis ITC) to contractual investment funds investing in investment companies, which themselves fall within the scope of this tax, is aligned to the tax treatment of a direct investment in such investment companies. This measure enters into force as from the publication in the Belgian Official Gazette.
Tax on stock exchange transactions: as from 2018, rates increase from 0.09% to 0.12% and from 0.27% to 0.35%.
The Cayman tax has been amended at various levels so as to increase its effectiveness and close some existing loopholes. Changes are in place to target intermediate structures. Distributions made by legal structures without legal personality (e.g. trusts) become taxable, except if they have been already taxed. This measure applies as from 17 September 2017. Some exclusions are better outlined, particularly the substance exclusion.
‘Fonds dédiés’ as well as ‘de facto’ associations (labour unions) having foreign investment income (trade unions) fall within the scope of the tax.
The changes apply to income received, granted or paid as from 1 January 2018
Reimbursements of paid-up capital: The reimbursement of capital is deemed to derive proportionally from paid-up capital and from taxed reserves (incorporated and non-incorporated into capital) and exempted reserves incorporated into the capital. The reduction of capital will be allocated to paid-up capital in the proportion of the paid-up capital in the total capital increased by certain reserves. The portion allocated to the reserves is deemed to be a dividend and become subject to withholding tax (if applicable). Share premium distribution is submitted to the same system.
Exempted reserves not incorporated into the capital remain beyond of the scope of the rule.
Some elements such as revaluation surplus, provisions for liabilities and charges, unavailable reserves, etc. have to be withdrawn from the reserves taken into account to calculate the coefficient. A sequence of allocation has been provided if the amount of the paid-up capital and sums being treated as capital are insufficient. This change is applicable to capital reduction decided by a general meeting as from 1 January 2018.
Company cars: From a personal income tax point of view, tax deduction of costs linked to cars is brought into line with the rules applicable to companies as from 1 January 2018. This implies changes regarding the rate of deductibility (which will be linked to the CO2 emission), the capital gains tax on cars, the depreciation regime, etc. However, for individuals, a minimum deduction of 75% remains applicable for cars bought before 1 January 2018.
In general, under the current system (applicable to companies), the deductibility rate of car costs in the hands of Belgian companies and Belgian PEs varies in a range between 50% and 120% of the costs, depending on the type (fuel) and CO2 emission of the company car. The deduction for fuel costs is set at 75%.
These rules change as follows:
Latest update: 11 May 2018
The Belgian government reached an agreement that as from the 1 October 2018 the parties would be able to opt to charge VAT on the leasing of the immovable property. Both landlord and tenant need to mutually agree on the option to apply VAT and the tenant needs the use the immovable property for its economic activity. The possibility to apply VAT on lettings would be open to projects as of 1 October 2018. Moreover, the VAT adjustment period on eligible properties will in such case be extended from 15 years to 25 years.
Along with the introduction of the option to tax, short-term leasing of maximum 6 months would also will de iure be subject to VAT in both a B2B and B2C-context.
Remark : The above announced measure are subject to change.
Following the VAT action plan as launched in 2016, the EU Commission published a Proposal for the Definitive VAT system for Cross Border EU Trade.The aim of the Proposal is to improve and modernise the current VAT system. This should reduce VAT fraud and simplify doing business within the EU Single Market. When adopted, the rules as we currently know them will change dramatically. This will cause a substantial impact, particularly for business active in the goods trade business.
The key points of this Proposal for a definitive VAT regime are:
As from 1 January 2015, the temporary increase of taxes on certain stock exchange transactions has become permanent. In addition, the tax rate of both secondary market transactions in shares and transactions in capitalisation funds is increased (for secondary market transactions in shares: increase to 0.27% with a maximum of EUR 800, for transactions in capitalisation funds: increase to 1.32% with a maximum of EUR 2,000).
The current fight against tax and social fraud would continue. Additional tax inspectors will be hired and trained by the Government.
In the framework of the budgetary control exercise in March 2015, the following measures in this regard were announced: ‘fiscal amnesty’ (for previously undeclared income), fight against abuse of corporate structures and online fraud, extension of data-mining projects, and better use of information concerning the 183 days rule.
The Belgian Minister of Finance also launched the ‘Plan to Combat Tax Fraud’ in December 2015, sharing new insights on how Belgium will be addressing the outcome of the OECD/G20 project in relation to Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”). A plea for coordinated actions in sync with global, OECD and EU initiatives as opposed to unilateral measures is a recurring theme that glimmers through the entire policy document.